Posts Tagged 'Muslims'

Leadership for Peace

Photo Credit: Bradley Weber via flickr

As I prepare to walk in the footsteps of St. Francis of Assisi in six weeks, I’m immersing myself in his life.  At this time in the life of our world, I’m finding myself drawn to Francis’s peacemaking skills.

St. Francis exercised peace leadership.  In the early thirteenth century, when Pope Innocent III rallied the troops for another Crusade against the Muslims in the Holy Land, Francis was appalled.  The Crusades broke his heart.

As Francis prayed about what part he was called to play, he felt moved to travel to Egypt where the Crusaders’ army found itself at a standoff with Sultan Malik Al Kamil’s army.  In the midst of the conflict, Francis felt called to cross battle lines and meet with the Sultan himself.

Cardinal Pelagius, the commander of the Crusaders’ army, at first refused Francis’s request to meet the Sultan, fearing that Francis would be killed attempting to cross to the other side.  At last he relented, in part because of his calculation that Francis might be better dead than alive, no longer pestering him about making peace, when Pelagius was committed to the path of war.

Miraculously, largely due to the openness of the Sultan, Francis crossed the battle line and survived.  Against the counsel of some of his generals, Sultan Malik Al Kamil agreed to meet Francis, and they had a mutually respectful conversation.  While Francis, not an official representative of Cardinal Pelagius, couldn’t formally respond to the Sultan’s proposal for compromise, Francis spoke of his desire for peace and affirmed the humanity of the Sultan and his people.

Cardinal Pelagius refused Malik Al Kamil’s proposal for compromise and continued his siege of the fortress city of Damietta until its inhabitants had died of starvation or by the sword.  Then he turned his face toward Cairo, ambitious to conquer that city.

Malik Al Kamil opened the sluice gates of the Nile, stranding the Crusaders’ army in the middle of the flood plain.  As the days on the plain stretched into weeks, Pelagius’s army ran out of food and began to starve.  Malik Al Kamil’s generals advised him to take advantage of the Crusaders and kill them while they were weak, just as Pelagius had done with the inhabitants of Damietta.  Instead, Malik Al Kamil retired to pray and returned with a different response.  He fed the Crusaders so they wouldn’t starve.  Shocked that the Sultan’s army brought them bread instead of killing them, the Crusaders began to see Malik Al Kamil and his people as human beings, and lost the will to fight them.  Subsequently, as word spread, Pope Innocent III had more difficulty mustering up an army to fight the Crusade, and the Crusade gradually sputtered out.

Because both Francis and Malik Al Kamil recognized in the other a person of deep faith and a person of peace, a way forward emerged when it had appeared there was no way.

How can the example of St. Francis and Sultan Malik Al Kamil enlighten us? How can their decision to seek peaceful resolutions within a world intent on war inspire us during the conflicts in our current world? Might we resolve to recognize the humanity in those whom we have been taught to view as “enemies” and together contemplate a better path ahead through dialogue and a commitment to work toward peace? The brave determination of the thirteenth-century peacemakers leads me to ask, “What is mine to do?” in the midst of conflict between Christians and Muslims today.


Light in the Darkness

Photo Credit: Markus Grossalber, via flickr

Photo Credit: Markus Grossalber, via flickr

The politics of fear rule the day in the U.S. presidential debate. No innovation, from time immemorial fear-mongering has proven effective in winning elections. And fear-mongering has always resulted in oppression built on distorting the truth about a particular population.

In recent centuries, apartheid in South Africa, the holocaust in Germany, and slavery in the U.S., to name but a few, have all depended upon fear-mongering. And to stir up fear in each case, the truth about the affected population must be distorted. It’s an old trick, and too often successful.

History repeats itself, and those of us in the U.S. now find ourselves in a frenzy of fear over Muslims. Donald Trump calls for the U.S. to close its doors to all Muslims. When asked about his plan to ban non-American Muslims from entering, he responded, “They’re not coming to this country. And if I’m president and if Obama has brought some to this country, they are leaving. They’re going. They’re gone.” Presidential candidate Ben Carson believes Islam to be inconsistent with the U.S. constitution and stated “I would not advocate that we put a Muslim in charge of this nation. I absolutely would not agree with that.”

Into this fear-frenzy entered a courageous voice of truth last week. Senator Lindsey Graham (R-SC) devoted a substantial portion of his air time in the second-string Republican Presidential debate to calling out the lies.

First, Sen. Graham pointed out how Trump’s approach decreases safety for Americans, rather than increasing it:

[W]hat [Donald Trump] said about banning Muslims coming here to America has made us all less safe, and it’s the worst possible thing he could do in this war.

The good news is . . . most people over there are not buying what ISIL’s selling. This is a religious war between radical Islam and the rest of the world. And there’s only one way you’re going to win this war. Help people in Islam who reject radical Islam to fight over there and destroy this ideology. Donald Trump has done the one single thing you cannot do. Declare war on Islam itself. ISIL would be dancing in the streets if they believed in dancing. This is a coup for them.”

Second, Graham apologized to Muslims around the world, expressing solidarity rather than judging all Muslims for the actions of ISIL extremists. He then recognized American Muslims in the military: “There are at least 3,500 American Muslims serving in the armed forces. Thank you for your service. You are not the enemy. Your religion is not the enemy.”

Sen. Graham realizes that the security of the U.S., and of the world at large, will not be attained by distancing ourselves from a whole population but rather by joining with those who oppose radical violence. The fear-mongering that persuades us to turn our backs on entire religious groups not only harms those groups but prevents us from recognizing allies who could help us work for peace. Voices like that of Sen. Graham remind us that a better path exists. May we listen to those discerning voices that lead us, like a light in the dark, beyond the voices of fear.